« Accord Climatique: Concession et Ratification »,
Forthcoming in Revue Economique, with T. Tazdaït
« Formation et Développement des Accords
Environnementaux : Les Effets de Leadership », Négociation,
2(2007) 121-137, with T. Tazdaït.
« Games of Influence in Climate
Change Negotiations : Modelling Interactions, », Ecological
Modelling,204 (2007) 301-314, with T.Tazdaït.
« The Status of Integrated Assessment in Climatic Policy
Making: An Overview of Inconsistencies Underlying Response Functions »,
Environmental
Science and Policy, 7 (2004) 69-75.
« Les Impacts du Changement Climatique : la Part de l’Arbitraire
», Natures, Sciences, Sociétés,4
(2004), with P. Ambrosi.
« An Evolutionay Approach to Global Change Negotiations
/ Une Approche Evolutionniste des Négociations Internationales dans
le Cadre du Changement Climatique », Louvain Economics Review,70
(1) (2004), with J.C. Péreau and T.Tazdaït.
« Multigas Emissions Coefficient in the JOBS model », OECD
ENV/EPOC/GSP 04/02 (2002)
« Socio-economics of policy formation and choices » in «
European Leadership of Climate Change and Sustainability Regimes »,
Grubb
M. and Gupta J. ed. Kluwer, Netherlands (2000), in collaboration
with J.C. Hourcade and T. Lepesant.
« The Making of International Environmental Agreements »,
Revision in Journal of Public Economic Theory
« What Environmental Treaty with Whom », Revision
in Ecological Economics
« North-South
Policy and Sizing-up the Climate Treaty: Should we Wait and See ?»,
submitted
« Explicit
Communication and the Weight of Rhetoric: A Stochastic Approximation of
Bargaining Outcomes», submitted
Work in progress
-Multigas Assessment in a CGE
framework
Abstract: Multi-gas emission assessment in integrated assessment models
is still at his infancy. Very few models provide sectorial and regional
disaggregated picture of multi-gas emissions over time. Recent research
devotes increasingly to provide emission inventories. Emission sources
and economic drivers are also getting better understood. Multi-gas emission
module will likely flourish in most integrated assessment models in the
coming years. This paper provides a description of the building of such
module in the JOBS Computable General Equilibrium Model. The building
of emission benchmarks for CO2, HFC, PFC, SF6, SO2, NOX and NMVOC
is described. Method and assumptions to derive an emission baseline are
explained. Preliminary results are presented under the form of a brief
economic and environmental outlook.
- Global environmental negotiations:
the role played by international institutions.
Short Abstract: The underlying idea of this contribution is to use correlation
as a mean to capture the role played by the President of the Conference
of the Parties within climate change negotiations. I show that by
suggesting an agreement proposal to each partie of the negotiation, the
President can increase social welfare.
- Dynamic Simulation of
Global Change Negotiation: Representing the Role Played by International
Institution
Short Abstract: This paper is in the same veine than the previous contribution.
The idea is to propose an application of the concept by presenting a dynamic
simulation of the climate change negotiation evaluating both subgame perfect
and tree correlated equilibria. I use the Nordhaus and Boyer RICE model
to evaluate all possible payoffs.
- Les négociations
globales d'environnement: nature du jeu et concepts d'équilibre
Short Abstract: This contribution is mostly methodological. I
present the nature of the climate change game (static vs dynamic, simultaneous
vs sequential, information structure) and discuss equilibria concepts.
- The Socio-Economics of Alien Species
Short Abstract: Part of the EU-FP6 ALARM project, this first contribution
aims at studying what economics can say about managing alien species invasion.
The overall objective of the contribution is to define a taxinomie of Alien
Species in order to review which economics tools could be the most adequate.
In particular, we focus on how useful could be cost-benefit, cost-efficiency
and multicriteria approaches.
- Mediation, Arbitration, Adjudication
and the provision of public goods
Short Abstract: I study the provision of public goods when agents write
binding agreements. A simple model is considered where unicity of the Nash
Equilibrium is proved to always exist under non restrictive assumptions.
The outcome is socially inefficent, no provision should be made. To solve
this inefficiency, I focus on the implementation by a third party of three
distinct coordination tools : mediation, arbitration and adjudication.
To this end, I define those coordination tools and present a method to
analyze them in our public economics setting. I characterize the equilibrium
structure when implementing each of those coordination tool. Only in some
cases does the equilibrium improves upon, resulting in more efficient provision
of the public good. In other cases, the third party proves to be useless.